<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Web Profile Wackiness</title> <atom:link href="http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/2008/02/web-profile-wackiness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/2008/02/web-profile-wackiness/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:22:23 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Jon</title><link>http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/2008/02/web-profile-wackiness/comment-page-1/#comment-8244</link> <dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:39:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/web-profile-wackiness/#comment-8244</guid> <description>If not JSF, then, what do the detractors suggest? JSP? Servlets? CGI? If Java is going to compete with .NET it needs a standard web application framework. I think those that are against its inclusion should specify what they think is wrong with it. Then, fix those problems.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If not JSF, then, what do the detractors suggest? JSP? Servlets? CGI? If Java is going to compete with .NET it needs a standard web application framework. I think those that are against its inclusion should specify what they think is wrong with it. Then, fix those problems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 11/19 queries in 0.081 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.steeplesoft.com @ 2012-02-07 14:22:50 -->
