My Thoughts on AT&T U-verse

January 5th, 2009

In a recent discussion, the fact that I have AT&T U-verse came up. I was asked what my thoughts on it are, and I promised a blog about it. This entry is the somewhat belated fulfillment of the promise.

First off, for those that don’t know, U-verse is, as best as I can tell, their answer to cable television. With the full package, which we have, you get a digital phone line, digital television, and high-speed internet all over fiber. Since the cable companies are offering telephone, it seems the phone companies are now offering television, with everyone in on this internet thing. For the impatient, the punch line here is that it’s a nice, but not perfect, offering. Let’s jump into the details.

As I noted, U-verse offers phone, internet, and television. We’ll start with the phone, as it’s probably the least…interesting of the three. If you have digital telephone, there’s not much exciting here. If you have a plain ol’ telephone (POTS) line, then you’re in for a treat. As you may or may not know, I work for Sun Microsystems from home. Being remote, I spend a lot of time on the phone. On my POTS line, I had a pretty awful buzz on the line, even though my house is brand new. After U-verse phone was installed, calls are crystal clear. No more I’m-sorry-can-you-repeat-thats. It’s made a huge difference for such a simple thing.

AT&T’s U-verse
is a nice,
but not perfect offering.
If it’s available you should
get it, but
be ready
to wait
for upgrades.
The internet, much like the phone, is not that interesting, I guess. If you have cable or DSL (I’m inclined to think U-verse high-speed internet is not DSL, but I’m not 100% sure), then you may not be immediately excited. While I discuss the physical part of U-verse in a moment, it’s worth noting here that I have a fiber optic line to the wall of house, with copper on the inside. Given the fiber…backbone, I expect I’ll be able to get some really fast speeds, and that’s already proving to be true. Currently, the offerings are 1.5/1.0, 3/1.0, 6/1.0, 10/1.5, and 18/1.5 Mbps down/up. Unlike the shared medium of cable, in which performance is said to degrade as more people in your neighborhood use the network, you get all your bandwidth with U-verse. For example, I recently upgrade my line from 1.5Mbps down to 3Mbps down. Here’s the before and after from speedtest.net. Note that both are near their max speeds in both directions.

The most interesting thing to me from U-verse is the TV/DVR package. As a (sadly) former MythTV user, I have extremely high expectations from my DVR. As a High Def (HD) customer with a low (these days) tolerance for hardware and software hacking, I’m forced to use the provider’s DVR. On the whole, the U-verse DVR is OK, but it falls far short of the MythTV experience, as well as that offered by DishNetwork. On the up side, it has a pretty intuitive interface, the channel line up is great, and the picture quality is excellent (and doesn’t degrade or disappear during storms, thank you DishNetwork!).

Having said that, the DVR does have its faults. One of the things we actually liked about the DishNetwork DVR was the ability to restrict the number of episodes of a given show that are kept. In our case, there are a number of children’s programs we record for our boys which come on just about every day. After just a week or two, that’s a lot of disk space taken up Curious George, Imagination Movers and Sid the Science Kid. With DishNetwork, we could easily limit the number to, say, five episodes, and the DVR would automatically purge the oldest episode. With the U-verse DVR, I do that manually. As you can probably imagine, it’s tedious and annoying.

Another oddity is DVR access from other rooms. When the system was first installed, if we wanted to watch a recorded program, we had to do it in the living. Typically, that’s OK, because that’s where the 52″ is, but, occasionally, we might want to watch a Psych from our bedroom before we turn in. Until recently, that wasn’t possible. To their credit, AT&T recently released “Total Home DVR” which was a transparent upgrade (transparent in that I have no clue when it was installed. The system just did it automagically), which enabled limited DVR usage in other rooms. This is an improvement, of course, but it appears to be read only. We don’t seem to be able to schedule new recordings or delete existing ones. Better than nothing, I guess, but it still has a way to go.

U-verse DVR Online Screen ShotOf course, what DVR from an internet provider would be complete without web access? The good news is that U-verse offers that. The bad news is that it is leagues behind MythWeb. Look at the screen shot to the right. What you see there is pretty much the most exciting page in the system. Like Total Home DVR, it’s better than nothing, but I think the developers on that part of the system would be well-served to look at MythWeb.

The search functionality also is not quite up to par with either MythTV or DishNetwork. U-verse only searches by program name, whereas the other two solutions would allow me to search by program type (TV show, movie, documentary, etc). This lack isn’t a major issue for us, but it’s little usability features like this one that make the U-verse DVR sub-par. While it may sound like I’m being really harsh on the system, I do enjoy and recommend it, but it certainly has a long way to go to catch the competition (with MythTV being the best by far of all those I’ve seen, including U-verse, DishNetwork and Cox).

Before I wrap this up, I thought I’d give a little insight into what one can expect physically in a U-verse installation. That is, what will the technician do to your house? In my case, it wasn’t too much. As I noted earlier, U-verse is fiber-based, so AT&T had to run fiber to my property (which it had already done for every lot in the neighborhood). From there, they ran more fiber to a box they installed on the outside of my house, in my case, to the back of my garage. The installer then drilled a hole through the brick, all the way into the interior of my garage. Next, he went inside the garage and hung two boxes on the wall next to the hole. One is a power supply, and the other is the “brains” (if I recall correctly) of the system. I won’t pretend to know exactly what it does in detail, but suffice it to say that it makes the system work. From there, he hooked the brains into the wiring in my house. Since my house is brand new (well, as of November 2007), I had cat 5e and coax run all over the house, so he was able to use that. If you don’t have at least cat 5 wiring, I expect your installation will take longer and be more invasive. Having done that, he then installed a 2Wire device that manages the voice and data network. This device serves as my “modem” as well as my access point, even offering basic firewall functionality (port forwarding, protocol blocking, etc). Once this was installed, all my normal phones began working again with no additional setup or hardware required.

On the DVR front, the set top boxes (sadly powered by Windows Media Center, thus making my “Microsoft-free home” claim not completely accurate : ) were installed on each TV requested. These boxes used the coax installed when the house was built, so there was no additional configuration here, either. He may have had to do some wiring in the wiring “cabinet” the builders installed, but there was not hole cutting required, which please both me and my wife. : )

One last thing to note: In the event of a power outage, the system DOES have a battery backup, but it will only last for so long. That being so, AT&T suggests that network usage (including voice, internet, and TV) be limited, as the more network traffic that occurs, the shorter the battery backup will last. They also strongly urge an alternate means for making phone calls, such as a cell, just in case the outage lasts a long time. We haven’t been hampered by this yet despite a couple of power outages, but we also have cell phones, so it’s not a big deal.

For the security conscious, our home security system works seamlessly with the U-verse phone system. For all the phones and security system can tell, they’re hooked up to a POTS line and are as happy as can be.

Clearly, U-verse, as a whole, is not a perfect system, but the release of Total Home DVR shows that AT&T engineers and technicians are still working on improving the system, so any faults it has today may not be there tomorrow, which is always a good thing. Overall, we are very happy with the system and recommend it whole-heartedly. In our books, despite minor irritations, the speed, clarity, and availability make it worth the money.

Technorati Tags:

Popularity: 21% [?]

9 Comments

  1. Lynn says

    Thanks for the review – a couple of questions:
    1. What were you using before U-Verse?
    2. You said you expect your internet speed to be much better. Is internet speed with U-Verse dependent upon closeness to the nearest ATT station?
    Nice to know speed doesn’t degrade with more users.
    Take care.

    January 5th, 2009 | #

  2. Jason Lee says

    Hi Lynn. :)

    1. I had AT&T DSL, POTS, and DishNetwork for television. With MytTV, I used Cox Cable, but that was at an old house. Cox wouldn’t install a line to our new house (neighborhood too new, so there wasn’t “enough demand” so AT&T and DishNetwork won).
    2. I don’t know that I expect it to better (I hope I didn’t imply that). What I meant was there’s nothing exciting there. Assuming everything’s working, broadband is broadband in my books. Based on the speedtest.net results, though, it seems I’m able to use almost all of the available throughput, which is more than I can say about previous providers. As good as that is, I just don’t think anyone would sit down and say, “Wow! This is so cool!” Unless they’ve never seen broadband before. :P

    January 5th, 2009 | #

  3. bubba says

    Great review – but you left out one of the important parts…. how much does it cost? I think I pay around $160 for the Cox bundle (phone, internet, and phone (which works with my ADT Security system)) with a couple of extras(starz, showtime, sports tier, etc…).

    And I didn’t see anything about having your cell phone thru AT&T getting you a discount… seems like they should bundle their cell phone family plans with this.

    January 6th, 2009 | #

  4. James Stansell says

    Hi Jason,

    You said you wondered if U-verse was DSL. Since you said it’s a fiber-optic connection, I really doubt it. Wild guess, but it might be a T3 connection.

    It was interesting to see their suggestion about using a cell phone in the case of a power outage. In Tulsa with the big ice storm 13 months ago we certainly found out to not rely on cell phones. Their batteries only last so long too. Plus, the cell towers were going out of service as _their_ battery backup died!

    Regards,

    -james.

    January 8th, 2009 | #

  5. John says

    Excellent review!

    I just had U-verse installed today (Royal Oak, MI) including the phone, cable tv and internet. I have not had the opportunity to play with it too much, but what I have seen I have liked. The interface is much better than what I had before (Wide Open West). The ability to schedule a recording via the internet is cool, although I don’t know how much I’ll use that capability. A couple things I don’t like: 1) for tvs other than the one with the DVR, you have to have a small receiver attached, which is an extra $5/month each (I have 4 of those). 2) The other annoyance at this time is the inability to pause live tv on those non-dvr sets. The installer said that capability would be added in the near future. My service here is $109 for the tv (which includes the $20 for the receivers) $30 for internet and $30 for phone. I still have to add the wireless phones to the bill, but my understanding is that there is no added bonus to doing that other than less paperwork for us since the cell phone bills will be together with the other stuff.

    January 22nd, 2009 | #

  6. Ron says

    If you experience connectivity errors (phone line failure) between your ADT alarm and your AT&T U-Verse Voice IP line, you need to do the following. Set up a service call with an ADT service rep, have a ADT tech come with a alarm system programmer. Inside your ADT box, the tech needs to adjust the program code from “CID” to “SEA”. Don;t ask me what that means, but after the alteration, it will allow your ADT system to connect and sent signals.

    January 29th, 2009 | #

  7. David says

    Very nice review. A couple of points to clarify, as I am also a Uverse subscriber.

    (1) Uverse uses Microsoft’s MediaRoom technology. This is not quite the same as Media Center. Media Center is actually a bit more advanced in features (such as supporting live TV pause/ff/rew from extenders, more options when programming series (such as the “keep xx shows” functionality you mentioned), etc. Unlike Media Center you cannot use standard Media Center extenders (like Xbox 360), so you are locked into paying for the extender rentals (which I believe are now $7 per box unfortunately).

    (2) On the bright side, it does seem like MS and AT&T are working to get all the features from Media Center into this new system gradually, so I expect it to improve as time goes on. I get the impression that there have been a number of reliability issues they had to fight, which they seem to have chased down and fixed (in my experience). Seems like now they can move on to the other features instead of fighting bugs.

    (3) You alluded to this in your review, but I think it should be clarified a bit. Like you, I have a new house with “fiber to the premises”. From what I have heard, this eliminates most all potential issues with Uverse. People without this (and a home wired for networking) should expect MUCH lengthier install times and potentially some issues that need to be worked out over time. From what I have heard, one of the things that will go a LONG way towards eliminating issues inside the house is to make sure they do the wiring with Cat5e rather than taking the simple route and using coax.

    (4) My installer mentioned that they are also working on allowing hookup of external USB drives to the dvr to increase capacity. This was a concern of mine as I come from using Media Center where I had one terrabyte of storage and never had to worry about running out (such as with your Curious George episodes). Another nice thing with that is if I did come close I could simply delete the programs through Windows Explorer en masse, much easier than the four clicks or so per program that going through the interface requires.

    (5) I was also quite disappointed to find that I cannot delete programs from the extenders. Media Center allows this. It is more of an issue for me, as my dvr is in my office and we often watch shows from the living room. I have to remember which ones we watched and delete them in the office later. However, the bulk of my scheduling is done in my office, and that can’t be done from extenders either. I hope improving the extender functionality is their number one priority right now, as this is to me the biggest weakness (esp the lack of pause/ff/rew).

    Thanks

    March 11th, 2009 | #

  8. Andrew says

    Hey I just wanted to let you know, as of last June( and due to financial problems probably currently) AT&T doesn’t run fiber to the house. I know because I worked upgrading the infrastructure for uverse. The fiber for your neighborhood runs to a device called a vrad, a beige box with a power meter ok the side. The signal then gets laid onto copper and fed through the Cross connect box where it travels to the terminal in your yard down your drop wire and into your NID on the back of your house. So. The last 100- 2000 feet is the same copper line you had before, just with any unnecessary footage cut out so it’s a higher quality connection. In case you were wondering.

    April 29th, 2009 | #

  9. Jason Lee says

    Hey, Andrew. Thanks for the note. I thought I remembered seeing the orange-sheathed fiber cable running from the green post by the street to the box on the outside of my house. It’s certainly possible that I’m mistaken, as I didn’t stand around and watch them work. :) Either way, I don’t seem to suffer from the latency/stuttering issues that many seem to see. :)

    April 29th, 2009 | #

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

With many thanks to Kaushal Sheth
`