<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: My Thoughts on AT&amp;T U-verse</title> <atom:link href="http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/2009/01/my-thoughts-on-att-u-verse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/2009/01/my-thoughts-on-att-u-verse/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:22:23 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Jason Lee</title><link>http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/2009/01/my-thoughts-on-att-u-verse/comment-page-1/#comment-8478</link> <dc:creator>Jason Lee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:47:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/?p=188#comment-8478</guid> <description>Hey, Andrew.  Thanks for the note.  I thought I remembered seeing the orange-sheathed fiber cable running from the green post by the street to the box on the outside of my house.  It&#039;s certainly possible that I&#039;m mistaken, as I didn&#039;t stand around and watch them work. :)  Either way, I don&#039;t seem to suffer from the latency/stuttering issues that many seem to see. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Andrew.  Thanks for the note.  I thought I remembered seeing the orange-sheathed fiber cable running from the green post by the street to the box on the outside of my house.  It&#8217;s certainly possible that I&#8217;m mistaken, as I didn&#8217;t stand around and watch them work. <img
src='http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Either way, I don&#8217;t seem to suffer from the latency/stuttering issues that many seem to see. <img
src='http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/2009/01/my-thoughts-on-att-u-verse/comment-page-1/#comment-8477</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:03:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/?p=188#comment-8477</guid> <description>Hey I just wanted to let you know, as of last June( and due to financial problems probably currently) AT&amp;T doesn&#039;t run fiber to the house. I know because I worked upgrading the infrastructure for uverse. The fiber for your neighborhood runs to a device called a vrad, a beige box with a power meter ok the side. The signal then gets laid onto copper and fed through the Cross connect box where it travels to the terminal in your yard down your drop wire and into your NID on the back of your house. So. The last 100- 2000 feet is the same copper line you had before, just with any unnecessary footage cut out so it&#039;s a higher quality connection. In case you were wondering.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I just wanted to let you know, as of last June( and due to financial problems probably currently) AT&amp;T doesn&#8217;t run fiber to the house. I know because I worked upgrading the infrastructure for uverse. The fiber for your neighborhood runs to a device called a vrad, a beige box with a power meter ok the side. The signal then gets laid onto copper and fed through the Cross connect box where it travels to the terminal in your yard down your drop wire and into your NID on the back of your house. So. The last 100- 2000 feet is the same copper line you had before, just with any unnecessary footage cut out so it&#8217;s a higher quality connection. In case you were wondering.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/2009/01/my-thoughts-on-att-u-verse/comment-page-1/#comment-8456</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:03:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/?p=188#comment-8456</guid> <description>Very nice review.  A couple of points to clarify, as I am also a Uverse subscriber.(1) Uverse uses Microsoft&#039;s MediaRoom technology.  This is not quite the same as Media Center.  Media Center is actually a bit more advanced in features (such as supporting live TV pause/ff/rew from extenders, more options when programming series (such as the &quot;keep xx shows&quot; functionality you mentioned), etc.  Unlike Media Center you cannot use standard Media Center extenders (like Xbox 360), so you are locked into paying for the extender rentals (which I believe are now $7 per box unfortunately).(2) On the bright side, it does seem like MS and AT&amp;T are working to get all the features from Media Center into this new system gradually, so I expect it to improve as time goes on.  I get the impression that there have been a number of reliability issues they had to fight, which they seem to have chased down and fixed (in my experience).  Seems like now they can move on to the other features instead of fighting bugs.(3) You alluded to this in your review, but I think it should be clarified a bit.  Like you, I have a new house with &quot;fiber to the premises&quot;.  From what I have heard, this eliminates most all potential issues with Uverse.  People without this (and a home wired for networking) should expect MUCH lengthier install times and potentially some issues that need to be worked out over time.  From what I have heard, one of the things that will go a LONG way towards eliminating issues inside the house is to make sure they do the wiring with Cat5e rather than taking the simple route and using coax.(4) My installer mentioned that they are also working on allowing hookup of external USB drives to the dvr to increase capacity.  This was a concern of mine as I come from using Media Center where I had one terrabyte of storage and never had to worry about running out (such as with your Curious George episodes).  Another nice thing with that is if I did come close I could simply delete the programs through Windows Explorer en masse, much easier than the four clicks or so per program that going through the interface requires.(5) I was also quite disappointed to find that I cannot delete programs from the extenders.  Media Center allows this.  It is more of an issue for me, as my dvr is in my office and we often watch shows from the living room.  I have to remember which ones we watched and delete them in the office later.  However, the bulk of my scheduling is done in my office, and that can&#039;t be done from extenders either.  I hope improving the extender functionality is their number one priority right now, as this is to me the biggest weakness (esp the lack of pause/ff/rew).Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice review.  A couple of points to clarify, as I am also a Uverse subscriber.</p><p>(1) Uverse uses Microsoft&#8217;s MediaRoom technology.  This is not quite the same as Media Center.  Media Center is actually a bit more advanced in features (such as supporting live TV pause/ff/rew from extenders, more options when programming series (such as the &#8220;keep xx shows&#8221; functionality you mentioned), etc.  Unlike Media Center you cannot use standard Media Center extenders (like Xbox 360), so you are locked into paying for the extender rentals (which I believe are now $7 per box unfortunately).</p><p>(2) On the bright side, it does seem like MS and AT&amp;T are working to get all the features from Media Center into this new system gradually, so I expect it to improve as time goes on.  I get the impression that there have been a number of reliability issues they had to fight, which they seem to have chased down and fixed (in my experience).  Seems like now they can move on to the other features instead of fighting bugs.</p><p>(3) You alluded to this in your review, but I think it should be clarified a bit.  Like you, I have a new house with &#8220;fiber to the premises&#8221;.  From what I have heard, this eliminates most all potential issues with Uverse.  People without this (and a home wired for networking) should expect MUCH lengthier install times and potentially some issues that need to be worked out over time.  From what I have heard, one of the things that will go a LONG way towards eliminating issues inside the house is to make sure they do the wiring with Cat5e rather than taking the simple route and using coax.</p><p>(4) My installer mentioned that they are also working on allowing hookup of external USB drives to the dvr to increase capacity.  This was a concern of mine as I come from using Media Center where I had one terrabyte of storage and never had to worry about running out (such as with your Curious George episodes).  Another nice thing with that is if I did come close I could simply delete the programs through Windows Explorer en masse, much easier than the four clicks or so per program that going through the interface requires.</p><p>(5) I was also quite disappointed to find that I cannot delete programs from the extenders.  Media Center allows this.  It is more of an issue for me, as my dvr is in my office and we often watch shows from the living room.  I have to remember which ones we watched and delete them in the office later.  However, the bulk of my scheduling is done in my office, and that can&#8217;t be done from extenders either.  I hope improving the extender functionality is their number one priority right now, as this is to me the biggest weakness (esp the lack of pause/ff/rew).</p><p>Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ron</title><link>http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/2009/01/my-thoughts-on-att-u-verse/comment-page-1/#comment-8440</link> <dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:25:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/?p=188#comment-8440</guid> <description>If you experience connectivity errors (phone line failure) between your ADT alarm and your AT&amp;T U-Verse Voice IP line, you need to do the following.  Set up a service call with an ADT service rep, have a ADT tech come with a alarm system programmer.  Inside your ADT box, the tech needs to adjust the program code from &quot;CID&quot; to &quot;SEA&quot;.  Don;t ask me what that means, but after the alteration, it will allow your ADT system to connect and sent signals.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you experience connectivity errors (phone line failure) between your ADT alarm and your AT&amp;T U-Verse Voice IP line, you need to do the following.  Set up a service call with an ADT service rep, have a ADT tech come with a alarm system programmer.  Inside your ADT box, the tech needs to adjust the program code from &#8220;CID&#8221; to &#8220;SEA&#8221;.  Don;t ask me what that means, but after the alteration, it will allow your ADT system to connect and sent signals.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/2009/01/my-thoughts-on-att-u-verse/comment-page-1/#comment-8437</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:55:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/?p=188#comment-8437</guid> <description>Excellent review!I just had U-verse installed today (Royal Oak, MI) including the phone, cable tv and internet.  I have not had the opportunity to play with it too much, but what I have seen I have liked.  The interface is much better than what I had before (Wide Open West).  The ability to schedule a recording via the internet is cool, although I don&#039;t know how much I&#039;ll use that capability.  A couple things I don&#039;t like: 1) for tvs other than the one with the DVR, you have to have a small receiver attached, which is an extra $5/month each (I have 4 of those).  2) The other annoyance at this time is the inability to pause live tv on those non-dvr sets.  The installer said that capability would be added in the near future.  My service here is $109 for the tv (which includes the $20 for the receivers) $30 for internet and $30 for phone.  I still have to add the wireless phones to the bill, but my understanding is that there is no added bonus to doing that other than less paperwork for us since the cell phone bills will be together with the other stuff.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent review!</p><p>I just had U-verse installed today (Royal Oak, MI) including the phone, cable tv and internet.  I have not had the opportunity to play with it too much, but what I have seen I have liked.  The interface is much better than what I had before (Wide Open West).  The ability to schedule a recording via the internet is cool, although I don&#8217;t know how much I&#8217;ll use that capability.  A couple things I don&#8217;t like: 1) for tvs other than the one with the DVR, you have to have a small receiver attached, which is an extra $5/month each (I have 4 of those).  2) The other annoyance at this time is the inability to pause live tv on those non-dvr sets.  The installer said that capability would be added in the near future.  My service here is $109 for the tv (which includes the $20 for the receivers) $30 for internet and $30 for phone.  I still have to add the wireless phones to the bill, but my understanding is that there is no added bonus to doing that other than less paperwork for us since the cell phone bills will be together with the other stuff.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James Stansell</title><link>http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/2009/01/my-thoughts-on-att-u-verse/comment-page-1/#comment-8425</link> <dc:creator>James Stansell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:46:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/?p=188#comment-8425</guid> <description>Hi Jason,You said you wondered if U-verse was DSL.  Since you said it&#039;s a fiber-optic connection, I really doubt it.  Wild guess, but it might be a T3 connection.It was interesting to see their suggestion about using a cell phone in the case of a power outage.  In Tulsa with the big ice storm 13 months ago we certainly found out to not rely on cell phones.  Their batteries only last so long too.  Plus, the cell towers were going out of service as _their_ battery backup died!Regards,-james.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason,</p><p>You said you wondered if U-verse was DSL.  Since you said it&#8217;s a fiber-optic connection, I really doubt it.  Wild guess, but it might be a T3 connection.</p><p>It was interesting to see their suggestion about using a cell phone in the case of a power outage.  In Tulsa with the big ice storm 13 months ago we certainly found out to not rely on cell phones.  Their batteries only last so long too.  Plus, the cell towers were going out of service as _their_ battery backup died!</p><p>Regards,</p><p>-james.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bubba</title><link>http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/2009/01/my-thoughts-on-att-u-verse/comment-page-1/#comment-8424</link> <dc:creator>bubba</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:26:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/?p=188#comment-8424</guid> <description>Great review - but you left out one of the important parts.... how much does it cost?  I think I pay around $160 for the Cox bundle (phone, internet, and phone (which works with my ADT Security system)) with a couple of extras(starz, showtime, sports tier, etc...).And I didn&#039;t see anything about having your cell phone thru AT&amp;T getting you a discount... seems like they should bundle their cell phone family plans with this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review &#8211; but you left out one of the important parts&#8230;. how much does it cost?  I think I pay around $160 for the Cox bundle (phone, internet, and phone (which works with my ADT Security system)) with a couple of extras(starz, showtime, sports tier, etc&#8230;).</p><p>And I didn&#8217;t see anything about having your cell phone thru AT&amp;T getting you a discount&#8230; seems like they should bundle their cell phone family plans with this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason Lee</title><link>http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/2009/01/my-thoughts-on-att-u-verse/comment-page-1/#comment-8422</link> <dc:creator>Jason Lee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:10:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/?p=188#comment-8422</guid> <description>Hi Lynn. :)1.  I had AT&amp;T DSL, POTS, and DishNetwork for television.  With MytTV, I used Cox Cable, but that was at an old house.  Cox wouldn&#039;t install a line to our new house (neighborhood too new, so there wasn&#039;t &quot;enough demand&quot; so AT&amp;T and DishNetwork won).
2.  I don&#039;t know that I expect it to better (I hope I didn&#039;t imply that).  What I meant was there&#039;s nothing exciting there.  Assuming everything&#039;s working, broadband is broadband in my books.  Based on the speedtest.net results, though, it seems I&#039;m able to use almost all of the available throughput, which is more than I can say about previous providers.  As good as that is, I just don&#039;t think anyone would sit down and say, &quot;Wow!  This is so cool!&quot;  Unless they&#039;ve never seen broadband before. :P</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lynn. <img
src='http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>1.  I had AT&#038;T DSL, POTS, and DishNetwork for television.  With MytTV, I used Cox Cable, but that was at an old house.  Cox wouldn&#8217;t install a line to our new house (neighborhood too new, so there wasn&#8217;t &#8220;enough demand&#8221; so AT&#038;T and DishNetwork won).<br
/> 2.  I don&#8217;t know that I expect it to better (I hope I didn&#8217;t imply that).  What I meant was there&#8217;s nothing exciting there.  Assuming everything&#8217;s working, broadband is broadband in my books.  Based on the speedtest.net results, though, it seems I&#8217;m able to use almost all of the available throughput, which is more than I can say about previous providers.  As good as that is, I just don&#8217;t think anyone would sit down and say, &#8220;Wow!  This is so cool!&#8221;  Unless they&#8217;ve never seen broadband before. <img
src='http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lynn</title><link>http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/2009/01/my-thoughts-on-att-u-verse/comment-page-1/#comment-8421</link> <dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:05:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.steeplesoft.com/?p=188#comment-8421</guid> <description>Thanks for the review - a couple of questions:
1. What were you using before U-Verse?
2. You said you expect your internet speed to be much better. Is internet speed with U-Verse dependent upon closeness to the nearest ATT station?
Nice to know speed doesn&#039;t degrade with more users.
Take care.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review &#8211; a couple of questions:<br
/> 1. What were you using before U-Verse?<br
/> 2. You said you expect your internet speed to be much better. Is internet speed with U-Verse dependent upon closeness to the nearest ATT station?<br
/> Nice to know speed doesn&#8217;t degrade with more users.<br
/> Take care.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/27 queries in 0.315 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.steeplesoft.com @ 2012-02-07 14:33:55 -->
